ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN LEGAL INTERPRETATION: THE ROLE OF LANGUAGE IN JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN THE AGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 3Issue III Year 2024
Dr.Humera Qureishi
Assistant Professor & IQAC Coordinator, Career College of Law, Barkatullah University, Bhopal.
humeraqureishi23@gmail.com
Table of Contents
Dr.Humera Qureishi
Assistant Professor & IQAC Coordinator, Career College of Law, Barkatullah University, Bhopal.
humeraqureishi23@gmail.com
Legal Interpretation- Judicial Ethics- Science and Technology- Digital Privacy- Biotechnology.
1. European Court of Justice, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Interpretation in Recent Case Law, 4 Eur. Data Prot. L. Rev. 101 (2018).
2. Cass R. Sunstein, C. R. Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.(2018).
3. Lawrence B. Solum, The interpretation-construction distinction. Constitutional Commentary, 27(1), 95-118.(2008).
4. A. M. Gonzalez, Bioethics in the Courtroom: Informed Consent and the Legal Standards of Disclosure, 46 J. Med. Ethics 468 (2020)
5. A. Scalia & B. A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (Thomson/West 2012).
6. C. Cohen. Linguistic Justice in the Law: The Role of Language in Legal Interpretation. Legal Studies, 40(2), 213-234. . (2020).
7. MacCormick, Neil. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2005)
8. A.McGowan. Environmental justice and the ethical implications of climate change litigation: A case study of Amazon deforestation. Environmental Law Review, 21(3), 183-198.(2019).
9. Solove, Daniel J. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: NYU Press. . (2004).
10. K.Caine. The implications of digital privacy rights: A critical analysis of Google Spain SL v. Agencia Espaola de Proteccin de Datos. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 259-287.(2021).
11. J. M. Balkin. Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. University of California Law Review, 51(1), 1149-1199.(2020).
12. R. Goodman. Ethical and Legal Challenges in Data Privacy: The Role of the GDPR. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(4), 312-335. (2020).
13. R. Dworkin. Laws empire. Harvard University Press.(1986).
14. Motomura, Hiroshi. Immigration Outside the Law. Oxford University Press. (2014).
15. S. Garvey. The ethics of language: What judges should know about the words they choose. The Yale Law Journal Forum, 128, 42-59.(2018).
16. Beauchamp, Tom L., & Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. (2013)
17. A. M. Gonzalez. Bioethics in the courtroom: Informed consent and the legal standards of disclosure. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(7), 468-472. (2020)
18. S.C.Borkowski. Judicial ethics and the challenges of bias: The need for ongoing education. Judicial Conduct Reporter, 42 (1), 1-5. https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/16831/judicial-conduct-reporter-2021-winter.pdf
19. Cohen, J. Balancing Deontology and Consequentialism in Judicial Interpretation: Ethical Considerations for Modern Judges, Law & Ethics Journal, 28(3), 155-70 (2022), )
20. Posner, R. A.How Judges Think. Harvard University Press 2008.
21. Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Judicial Ethics, available at https://plato.stanford.edu (accessed January 2025), highlighting the ethical dilemmas in judicial decision-making
22.
References
1. European Court of Justice, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Interpretation in Recent Case Law, 4 Eur. Data Prot. L. Rev. 101 (2018).
2. Cass R. Sunstein, C. R. Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.(2018).
3. Lawrence B. Solum, The interpretation-construction distinction. Constitutional Commentary, 27(1), 95-118.(2008).
4. A. M. Gonzalez, Bioethics in the Courtroom: Informed Consent and the Legal Standards of Disclosure, 46 J. Med. Ethics 468 (2020)
5. A. Scalia & B. A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (Thomson/West 2012).
6. C. Cohen. Linguistic Justice in the Law: The Role of Language in Legal Interpretation. Legal Studies, 40(2), 213-234. . (2020).
7. MacCormick, Neil. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2005)
8. A.McGowan. Environmental justice and the ethical implications of climate change litigation: A case study of Amazon deforestation. Environmental Law Review, 21(3), 183-198.(2019).
9. Solove, Daniel J. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: NYU Press. . (2004).
10. K.Caine. The implications of digital privacy rights: A critical analysis of Google Spain SL v. Agencia Espaola de Proteccin de Datos. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 259-287.(2021).
11. J. M. Balkin. Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. University of California Law Review, 51(1), 1149-1199.(2020).
12. R. Goodman. Ethical and Legal Challenges in Data Privacy: The Role of the GDPR. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(4), 312-335. (2020).
13. R. Dworkin. Laws empire. Harvard University Press.(1986).
14. Motomura, Hiroshi. Immigration Outside the Law. Oxford University Press. (2014).
15. S. Garvey. The ethics of language: What judges should know about the words they choose. The Yale Law Journal Forum, 128, 42-59.(2018).
16. Beauchamp, Tom L., & Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. (2013)
17. A. M. Gonzalez. Bioethics in the courtroom: Informed consent and the legal standards of disclosure. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(7), 468-472. (2020)
18. S.C.Borkowski. Judicial ethics and the challenges of bias: The need for ongoing education. Judicial Conduct Reporter, 42 (1), 1-5. https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/16831/judicial-conduct-reporter-2021-winter.pdf
19. Cohen, J. Balancing Deontology and Consequentialism in Judicial Interpretation: Ethical Considerations for Modern Judges, Law & Ethics Journal, 28(3), 155-70 (2022), )
20. Posner, R. A.How Judges Think. Harvard University Press 2008.
21. Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Judicial Ethics, available at https://plato.stanford.edu (accessed January 2025), highlighting the ethical dilemmas in judicial decision-making
22.