Volume 2Issue IV Year 2023
7th semester B. Com LL. B(Hons.), School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
jayakumarsruthy46@gmail.com
7th semester B. Com LL. B(Hons.), School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
jayakumarsruthy46@gmail.com
Genetic DNA Profiling- forensic-criminal investigation-incrimination-DNA fingerprinting
1. Stephen M Patton, DNA Fingerprinting: The Castro Case, 31 JOLT 223, 223-240 (1990).
2. DR. V NAGESWARA RAO, THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, A CRITICAL COMMENTARY COVERING EMERGING ISSUES AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (LexisNexis 2015).; Mary May, Next Generation Forensics: Changing the Role DNA Plays in the Justice System, SCIENCE IN THE NEWS (May 12, 2023, 02:34 PM) https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2018/next-generation-forensics-changing-role-dna-plays-justice-system/.
3. Spatz MA, Genetics Home Reference, 92 J Med Libr Assoc, 282, 282-3 (2004)
4. Victor Walter Weedn and John W Hicks, The Unrealized Potential of DNA Testing, 234 NATL. INST. JUSTICE J. 16 (1997).
5. Pantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh v State of Andhra Pradesh, (2009) 14 SCC 607. National Institute of Justice, Understanding DNA Evidence: A Guide for Victim Service Providers (Department of Justice, 2001).
6. PHIL FENNELL, CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
7. INDIA CONST. art.20, cl.3.
8. VN SHUKLA AND M.P SINGH, VN SHUKLAS CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (Eastern Book Company, 2018).
9. Anil A. Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra (1981) Bom HC Cri LJ 125; Anath Kumar Naik v. State of A.P (1977) AP HC CRILJ1797; Jamshed v. State of U.P (1976) ALL HC Cri LJ 1680.
10. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal and Ors (1999) 7 SCC 280.
11. People v. Wesley 73 N.Y. 2d 351 (1989); Williams v. Illinois 567 U.S. 50 (2012)
12. Mukesh Kumar Malviya, DNA Fingerprinting as an Evidence and Role of Indian Supreme Court, 1 INT J CRI & FOR SCI 40, 40-44 (2017).
13. Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017) 2 SCC (Cri) 673.
14. Sharda v. Dharmpal,Sharada v. Dharmpal (2003) SC 3450.
15. Surendra Koli v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2011) 4 SCC 80.
16. Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017) 2 SCC (Cri) 673.
17. Santosh Kumar Singh v. State Thr. CBI (2010) 9 SCC 747.
18. Kunhiraman v. Manoj,1991 2 KLT 190.
19. Supra Note 9.
1. Stephen M Patton, DNA Fingerprinting: The Castro Case, 31 JOLT 223, 223-240 (1990).
2. DR. V NAGESWARA RAO, THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, A CRITICAL COMMENTARY COVERING EMERGING ISSUES AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (LexisNexis 2015).; Mary May, Next Generation Forensics: Changing the Role DNA Plays in the Justice System, SCIENCE IN THE NEWS (May 12, 2023, 02:34 PM) https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2018/next-generation-forensics-changing-role-dna-plays-justice-system/.
3. Spatz MA, Genetics Home Reference, 92 J Med Libr Assoc, 282, 282-3 (2004)
4. Victor Walter Weedn and John W Hicks, The Unrealized Potential of DNA Testing, 234 NATL. INST. JUSTICE J. 16 (1997).
5. Pantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh v State of Andhra Pradesh, (2009) 14 SCC 607. National Institute of Justice, Understanding DNA Evidence: A Guide for Victim Service Providers (Department of Justice, 2001).
6. PHIL FENNELL, CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
7. INDIA CONST. art.20, cl.3.
8. VN SHUKLA AND M.P SINGH, VN SHUKLAS CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (Eastern Book Company, 2018).
9. Anil A. Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra (1981) Bom HC Cri LJ 125; Anath Kumar Naik v. State of A.P (1977) AP HC CRILJ1797; Jamshed v. State of U.P (1976) ALL HC Cri LJ 1680.
10. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal and Ors (1999) 7 SCC 280.
11. People v. Wesley 73 N.Y. 2d 351 (1989); Williams v. Illinois 567 U.S. 50 (2012)
12. Mukesh Kumar Malviya, DNA Fingerprinting as an Evidence and Role of Indian Supreme Court, 1 INT J CRI & FOR SCI 40, 40-44 (2017).
13. Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017) 2 SCC (Cri) 673.
14. Sharda v. Dharmpal,Sharada v. Dharmpal (2003) SC 3450.
15. Surendra Koli v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2011) 4 SCC 80.
16. Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017) 2 SCC (Cri) 673.
17. Santosh Kumar Singh v. State Thr. CBI (2010) 9 SCC 747.
18. Kunhiraman v. Manoj,1991 2 KLT 190.
19. Supra Note 9.